I have watched one too many Indian movies churned out of the Bollywood film factory where one size fits all, and one story reads all! 'Kahani' broke the status quo! Indian cinema seems to be coming of age. Sujoy Ghosh's two hour Indian movie, with English subtitles, had me glued to my seat enthralled.
The female lead, Ms. Balan has done a remarkable job! She is a very versatile actress and is to be commended for her outstanding performance as the overly pregnant Mrs. Bagchi from London looking for her missing husband, who came to Calcutta a month ago, at her insistence, on an assignment with the National Data Center.
A movie not to be missed!
"Half of a Yellow Sun" is both a love story and a story of war,
and I’m not certain which of the two makes more of an impact on the
reader.I decided to read this novel after I listened to Chimamanda Ngozi Adichi's speech at Narratives for Europe in Amsterdam.A very entertaining and natural speaker, Ms.
Adichi, in the most affable manner, cut President Sarkozy’s speech to shreds!
Still reeling under that impact of Ms Adichi’s impeccable articulation, I came
across “Half of a Yellow Sun” in my school library, and I couldn’t help but pick
it up.
Ms Adichi claims she wrote the novel “because I grew up in
the shadow of Biafra, because I lost both grandfathers in the Nigeria-Biafra
war, because I wanted to engage with my history in order to make sense of my
present, many of the issues that led to the war remain unresolved in Nigeria
today, because my father has tears in his eyes when he speaks of losing his
father, because my mother still cannot speak at length about losing her father
in a refugee camp, because the brutal bequests of colonialism make me angry,
because the thought of the egos and indifference of men leading to the
unnecessary deaths of men and women and children enrages me, because I don't
ever want to forget.”With so many goals
to achieve, Chimamanda set herself up for a difficult task of presenting a war
that the world didn’t remember or recognize, and a story of love that unfolds
within that unacknowledged war.
Set in the backdrop of the three year war fought by the
secessionist state of Biafra against the Nigerian Federal Military, the novel is
stark and even gory in it’s depiction of the senseless slaughter and vitriolic
violence that happened in South East Nigeria even as the rest of humanity watched
unashamedly, or as Adichi’s alternate storyteller in “The Book” states, “The World
Was Silent When We Died.” Admittedly, majority of readers will come out of this
reading with a new awareness of the legacy the British left behind in
post-colonial Nigeria.
The reader will know how Biafra came to be; who were
these Biafrans; why did they choose to secede from the rest of Nigeria;
why did Biafra last only three years, and what happened
to it at the end of those three years? With her vivid portrayal of a strife
torn nation, Adichi compels the reader to wonder why no one intervened to stop
this massacre which cost the world a million lives!
The backdrop of the Biafran massacre would not have been as
compelling had not Adichi woven some dynamic characters into this conflict
ridden landscape.There are the twin
Igbo sisters, Olanna and Kainene, who being born into wealth and status, choose
diametrically opposite lifestyles but share a common zeal for independence
and a highly evolved sense of justice.Ugwu, the thirteen year old houseboy and narrator of the story for
the major part, represents the poorer sections of Igbo society. Richard, the
shy white British journalist and the world’s only real window into Nigeria
at the time, is the paramour of one of the twins. Then there is the
revolutionary academician Odenigbo, who lives through the tumult of secession,
desperately holding on to his vision of an independent Biafra.
The Biafran experience is enmeshed in the lives of these characters as they
negotiate peace for themselves and for their people in post colonial Nigeria.
It is in the story of their lives in those three Biafran years that love takes on a new meaning as does the definition of loyalty. The characters take on an environment that is hostile, relentless, and in flux from one
moment to the next. Their relationships evolve in this uncertain atmosphere where
betrayal is expected but not forgiven, and love lies in the stealth of darkness and death, but there is no silver lining
that awaits!
I like movies that transport me
into a world distinctly different from mine, and Taylor Tate’s The Help,
based on Kathryn Stockett’s novel, did.
It took me to Mississippi
during the 1960s when the word ‘Negro’ was not a slur, and when all a black
woman could hope to achieve was to be a maid in a rich white home. I also liked
the movie because it presented white and black America
of the time with equanimity that’s colored in candor, humor, and wit. The
black and white characters both have their share of skeletons to hide, and Tate
indulges these characters by letting them be exactly who they are: at times
shallow, sometimes wicked, oftentimes insecure, even downright evil, but
overall very real. There is Minny (Octavia Spenser) and then there’s Skeeters (Emma Stone), two undaunted women,
one black one white, both witty and winsome and who enchant the audience while
making good of the worst of situations.
Viola Davis who plays the silent yet solid Aibileen, the black maid
whose story is the first of many to go public in a NYC newspaper, whose stoicism
is in sharp contrast to Minny’s effervescence; yet both so real. Not to be
outdone, the ‘white’ characters are just as delectable; the overtly
segregationist ‘Hilly’ and the socially ostracized bottle blond “Celia’ are a
treat to watch, especially as they outdo each other in petty pursuits.
The movie, though set in the times of social segregation,
deals with race relations in a lighter mode yet sends a clear message decrying
racial discrimination of the 60s. The Help provides for two hours of witty and wholesome
entertainment.
Having watched and posted on Ayad Akhtar's movie"The War Within" a few years ago, here was no doubt that I would read Akhtar's debut novel "American Dervish" some time soon. Besides, American Dervish had received several favorable mentions in the news media, so when I found the novel sitting on the coffee table at my sister's place, I asked her if I could borrow it. My sister who had "finished reading it in a few sittings" had a lot to say about the novel; that was a significantly strong reaction coming from her. However, I managed to dissuade her from discussing the novel, but not before I heard her say that "the book was an 'Islam/Muslim Culture 101'" for her, and so it was for me too! American Dervish explores the religious identities of several characters, from different age groups and belonging to different strata of American society, before Hayat, the novel's narrator who too has been through the tumultuous process of exploring his identity, emerges the 'dervish'.
Akhtar's American Dervish is a coming of age story of Hayat Shah, a ten year old boy born into a rich Pakistani immigrant family living in Milwaukee during the 1980s. Hayat's story would have been a lot different had Mina not happened to the family. Mina, a friend of Hayat's mother, comes to the US in order to escape her ex husband who is threatening to get custody of her five year old son Imran. Mina is a well educated, articulate and forward thinking Pakistani woman who also happens to be good looking and thus becomes ten year old Hayat's boyhood crush. Her entry into Hayat's family sets several sub plots in motion, all of which help unfold a catchy story; one depicting the struggle of several characters trying to live out their Muslim identities. Being the storyteller, Hayat comes out of the struggle significantly wiser on what it meant to be a Muslim living in Milwaukee in the 1980s.
American Dervish is definitely not a Reluctant Fundamentalist; primarily because Ayad Akhtar's aim was to tell a story in a way that would optimize readership. Mohsin Hamid, the author of The Reluctant Fundamentalist, though telling a story, has a clear prerequisite for his readers; they need erudition of the kind that will ease them into the planned and perfected writing of Hamid's and appreciate the captivating story Hamid has to tell.
Regardless, if it's a gripping story you want to read, Ayad Akhtar's American Dervish is a perfect fit.
I have my brother to thank for suggesting and then buying me this very
informative and entertaining read by Stephen Kinzer, titled All the Shah’s
Men. My brother and I had been
discussing how Iran
seemed to be making headlines in US media of late, and that is when he mentioned
“All the Shah’s Men". He recommended I read it to better understand Iran’s
wariness of the United States Government in the current stand off
between Iran
and the nuclear member nations regarding Iran’s
nuclear weapons program; the countries
alleging that Iran
was but a step away from producing a nuclear weapon. Iran’s President Ahmadinejad,
the ever illusive statesman that he is, is only adding fuel to fire by not providing any clear
answers, and the stand off continues with member nations of the nuclear club
waiting with bated breath wanting to know, “Does Iran have a nuclear weapon?”
It was in the back drop of this current stand off that I started reading
Kinzer’s book, the title of which is a take on Nixon’s Watergate scandal made
famous by the movie titled “All the Presidents Men”. Kinzer’s “All the Shah’s Men” is no less of a
Watergate as it is based on findings from CIA
documents that were released to the public in 2001. These documents revealed how the CIA
conspired with the British government to oust the Mossadegh Government in Iran
during the 1950s. Mossadegh, was a popular nationalist who believed, "The Iranian himself is the best person to manage his house" and thus became a thorn in the side of the British who according to Mossadegh were 'bleeding Iran dry through the Anglo Iran Oil Company". The book reveals how much money, time, and effort were put in to get rid of Mossadegh who by then was a world icon having made it on the cover of "Time" magazine. The British called it "Operation Boot' and the US termed it Operation Ajax, but regardless of its name, the operation is a real eye opener to what and how much the CIA can do,
even on foreign soil! The key figure in the operation was CIA
agent Kermit Roosevelt, the grandson of President Theodore Roosevelt. Roosevelt
planned and implemented Operation Ajax which involved bribing influential
figures, planting false reports in newspapers and provoking street violence
that had some 300 people dead on the streets of Tehran in less than three hours. Operation Ajax was basically about masterminding
a coup that would overthrow Iran’s
elected Prime Minister, Mossadegh, who having nationalized Iran’s oil industry, had angered the British Government which had until then owned and
run Iran’s oil
production. Roosevelt’s
coup in 1953 did bring an end to Mossadegh and also diffused the tension of Britain attacking Iran which to the Americans was a bigger threat as it would threaten to bring Soviet Russia into the picture. With Mossadegh gone, the British could heave a sigh of relief and keep their control over the Anglo Iran Oil, and that would eliminate all possibility of communist Russia
taking over Iran’s
oil wells in case the British were to leave. Operation Ajax definitively put Anglo Iran Oil back into the hands of a
consortium of nations that included the British, the Americans, the Dutch, and
the French. In addition, it ushered
in a quarter-century of relatively calmer dictatorial rule under a young and
insecure Shah who depended largely on US funding and resources. Kinzer claims that Operation Ajax lead to a politically weak and desperate period for Iran which brought in heightened Islamic militancy in Iran
and that eventually became a mainstay of the region.
All the Shah’s Men is a very engrossing read that rivetingly tells of a CIA
driven foreign coup to ‘control Iranian oil fields, over concerns of Iran
coming under control of Soviet Russia’. It provides the reader with once classified information
about Operation Ajax which is ‘now regarded as a mistake that has compromised U.S.'s
ability to defend democracy around the world’, which certainly makes this
book a very relevant read! The Preface
titled “The Folly of Attacking Iran” is a delectable read by itself! "As militants in Washington urge a second American attack on Iran, the
story of the first one becomes more urgently relevant than ever," Kinzer
writes in his new essay. "It shows the folly of using violence to try
to reshape Iran."
Is nostalgia becoming a modern day epidemic? Nostalgia for... a place that once was, a country one left behind, a people we once were, a lifestyle that once was, the person you once were, the friends you once had; the list is endless! If indeed nostalgia has taken such mammoth proportions, one wonders why that is so, and what it will lead to. Mohsin Hamid a renowned writer of "The Reluctant Fundamentalist" fame claims, "we live in a world that is changing more and more rapidly, and the
desire to look back with longing is growing more and more strong. But we
can't return to the past and it is dangerous to try." Nostalgia, as suggested by Hamid, may be a result of the rapidly changing world that we now inhabit. A world that is shrinking every minute because distances have ceased to matter. The instant and super-fast connectivity of the internet and the i-phone have certainly resulted in virtual proximity, but then why the nostalgia? Hamid's answer is because " I liked my new existence, but I'd liked my old one too, and I imagined places where the two could come together." Which points to the very ephemeral nature of our modern day existence; we barely get our hands on our present, and it is gone or has evolved into something smarter or more complex. Given the transient nature of our present, we are compelled to go back to it in order to fathom it and enjoy it. That going back is nostalgic, and it is invariably colored by that which we are seeking at that moment in our lives. Nostalgia thus becomes that utopia which we frequently inhabit to feel in control of our fast paced and fast changing lives; nostalgia allows us to 'spin our straw into gold' as Sandra Cisneros would have said.
Much as I love immigrant literature, I have to admit that it is usually born out of nostalgia, whether it's Lahiri, Jelloun, Allende, or Cisneros. They all write about the indomitable human spirit that will not give up even when rooted out of its natural environment and coerced to adapt and assimilate in foreign soil. However, there exists a monotony of theme and thought in these writings because, "Nostalgia, as always, had wiped away bad memories and magnified the
good ones. No one was safe from its onslaught." (Gabriel Garcia Marquez.). The Mohammad's and the Willie Loman's of Literature are tragic heroes no doubt but are losers in real life because they too indulge in nostalgia which spells their doom. Nostalgia implies a disconnect with the present because we are embedded in a magical past, and it will never let go, thus killing any likelihood of a future that might have been. A dangerous predicament for sure, especially in a world that's 'full of care, and we have no time to stand and stare' into the magical quicksand of nostalgia.
Having read several autobiographies and memoirs of journeys undertaken by immigrants to come and settle in United States of America, and eventually making their American dream happen, I was not really gung ho about reading yet another immigrant memoir. In fact, I had Lac Su sitting on my to-read list for quite a
while. It was only because I had nothing better to read today, did I pick up “I LoveYous Are for White People"; needless to say, my expectations were at the very
minimal. I simply wanted a read that
would lull me into daytime slumber despite the unrelenting war waged on me by viral rhinitis. Lac
Su’s novel did anything but lull me to sleep; however, it did sideline the
viral war, as I forgot my pains and aches, even my sniffling was significantly less during the two and a half hours I was
reading the novel.
Lac Su provides a very graphic, yet teasing account of how
he and his family escaped Communist Vietnam in 1979. The only other such novel that evoked a
similar response was Laila Lalami’s “Hope and Other Dangerous Pursuits”. Lac Su’s
novel’s opening is a jump start that breathes interest and excitement in the
reader which Su is able to sustain for the major part of the memoir which is
divided into fourteen chapters. Each chapter
is given an intriguing title which forces the reader to go that next chapter
before putting the book down; that is how I read it in one sitting. Given that
the title of the memoir is so catchy, the anecdotal chapters had to follow
suit; so in the memoir, there are chapter titles like ‘heavy Javi’, “A is for boy and B is for
cat”, “the naked truth” etc. Having said that, I must add that some chapters are
not as succulent as the others, especially the ones dealing with the gang wars
in Hollywood. The overall
impression though is of a gripping memoir that is heartfelt and true, and must
have been cathartic for the writer as he admits to in one of his interviews.
A parting note: As
soon as I finished that last chapter, I looked at the date of publication of
this novel because the content and some of the underlying themes have an Amy
Chua taste to them. Amy Chua the “TigerMom” had the western world in disbelief as she unraveled unique parenting
styles adopted by many Chinese families in her January 2011 article titled Why Chinese Mothers are Superior. Apparently Ms.Chua wasn’t as much of a
maverick in parenting as we imagined her to be; Lac Su had a head start on her since his memoir "I Love Yous are For White People" published in 2009, gives the reader an insightful account of Asian parenting, Vietnamese style.
Tahar Ben Jaloun’s ‘a palace in the old village’ is about the
dream of Mohammad, an ordinary Moroccan, to bring his children back together
under one roof in his old village. Despite being a migrant worker in France for forty
years, Mohammad believes “La France
is good for the French not for us…nothing of France
had found a place in his heart or his soul.” A decent man and a good father and
husband, Mohammad believes "he is a Muslim before being a Moroccan, and before
becoming an immigrant. ” For him Islam is
a refuge that “calms him and brings him peace”, even as his children with “their
Arab features and gestures” are now ‘assimilated’ French and European, and want
nothing to do with his preposterous dream of wanting to bring the family
together in their old Moroccan village. Jelloun’s Mohammad is much like Arthur
Miller’s Willy Loman and Joe Keller. Mohammad, like Miller’s protagonists, is a
modern day tragic hero who is delusional and lives in a happier past that often
makes him forget the realm of today, and this predicament and his handling of
it arouses reader sympathy.
Tahar Ben Jelloun in ‘a palace in the old village’ is being
the ‘witness’ he claims every writer is…. “He bears witness to his time—he
tells stories, and in so doing comments on his society and the world.”In
this novel, Jelloun highlights the plight of immigrants in North
Africa to show that "emigration is no longer a solution; it's
a defeat. People are risking death, drowning every day, but they're knocking on
doors that are not open. My hope is that countries like Morocco
will have investment to create work, so people don't have to leave."